Scheduled cadence
- Runs on an agreed rhythm regardless of volume that week.
- Covers the full lane — demand, exceptions, documentation, and fit.
- Good for catching slow drift that no single ticket reveals on its own.
A lane that never gets reviewed drifts. A useful cadence is not a status meeting — it takes recurring demand, repeat exceptions, and documentation gaps and turns them into a named change, owner, and next check.
Which request families showed up most, and did that match what was scoped?
Which categories from the escalation matrix triggered more than once, and why?
Where did the request record or service profile fail to give the next person enough context?
What did the last review decide, and did it actually happen?
Any pattern in client-facing friction that points at a scope or communication gap?
Is the lane trending toward a different reference band, or toward needing a second lane?
| Selling practice owner | Attends every review; approves scope and relationship-affecting changes. |
|---|---|
| Delivery review owner | Attends every review; brings demand, exception, and documentation evidence. |
| Client | Not normally present; represented through feedback the practice brings in. |
| Decision record | Written down in the pass it was made, with a named owner and next check. |
A review agenda built from real request records and exception notes moves faster than one built from memory.